Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 55: e11850, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1360230

ABSTRACT

Clinical indicators do not adequately predict the long-term prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio is expected to be a reliable predictor of the long-term prognosis of these patients. This study aimed to explore the correlation between the LDL/HDL ratio and long-term prognosis in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Patients with confirmed STEMI who underwent PCI in 7 hospitals in China from January 2009 to December 2011 were enrolled. Information about clinical endpoints, including all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events, was collected. Overall, 915 patients were included for analysis, the average follow-up time was 112.2 months. According to the LDL/HDL ratio, the patients were divided into 3 groups using the three-quantile method: low (LDL/HDL≤1.963), medium (1.963<LDL/HDL<2.595), and high (LDL/HDL≥2.595) LDL/HDL groups. The rate of coronary revascularization was higher in the high LDL/HDL group (28.52%) than in the low (17.38%, P=0.001) and medium (19.34%, P=0.010) LDL/HDL groups. The hazard ratio of coronary revascularization was significantly higher in the high LDL/HDL group than in the low (P=0.007) and medium (P=0.004) LDL/HDL groups. Increased LDL/HDL ratio was an independent risk factor for long-term coronary revascularization in STEMI patients undergoing PCI (HR=1.231, 95%CI: 1.023-1.482, P=0.028). These findings suggest that an increased LDL/HDL ratio was an independent risk factor for long-term coronary revascularization in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. The risk of coronary revascularization was significantly increased in patients with LDL/HDL≥2.595.

2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(5): 805-821, Sept.-Oct. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-892886

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Aim: The role of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) in erectile dysfunction (ED) is not clearly determined. The purpose of this study is to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of LI-ESWT for ED patients. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were searched in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG and VIP databases. Effective rate in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) and Erectile Hardness Score (EHS) at about 1XSmonth after LI-ESWT was extracted from eligible studies for meta-analysis to calculate risk ratio (RR) of effective treatment in ED patients treated by LI-ESWT compared to those receiving sham-treatment. Results: Overall fifteen studies were included in the review, of which four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were for meta-analysis. Effective treatment was 8.31 [95°/o confidence interval (CI): 3.88-17.78] times more effective in the LI-ESWT group (n=176) than in the sham-treatment group (n= 101) at about 1 month after the intervention in terms of EHS, while it was 2.50 (95% CI: 0.74-8.45) times more in the treatment group (n= 121) than in the control group (n=89) in terms of IIEF-EF. Nine-week protocol with energy density of 0.09mJ/mm2 and 1500 pluses seemed to have better therapeutic effect than five-week protocol. No significant adverse event was reported. Conclusion: LI-ESWT, as a noninvasive treatment, has potential short-term therapeutic effect on patients with organic ED irrespective of sensitivity to PDE5is. Owing to the limited number and quality of the studies, more large-scale, well-designed and longterm follow-up time studies are needed to confirm our analysis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL